Status report on flood warning systems in the United States /
Material type: TextSeries: Wetmore CollectionPublisher: New York Springer-Verlag 1989Description: 7 pages : maps ; 28 cmContent type:- text
- unmediated
- volume
- VF FLOD.120.b.e.c.02 GruE 1989 ASFPM
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Government Publications | ASFPM Library | Wetmore Collection | VF FLOD.120.b.e.c.02 GruE 1989 ASFPM (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available |
Browsing ASFPM Library shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
VF FLOD.120 IACWD 1982 ASFPM Guidelines for determining flood flow frequency / | VF FLOD.120 MDNR 1981 ASFPM Would a flood warning system benefit your community? / | VF FLOD.120.b.e.c.02 FEMA 1988 ASFPM Guide to flood maps : how to use a flood map to determine flood risk for a property / | VF FLOD.120.b.e.c.02 GruE 1989 ASFPM Status report on flood warning systems in the United States / | VF FLOD.120.b.e.c.02 IACWD 1985 ASFPM Guidelines on community local flood warning and response systems / | VF FLOD.120.b.e.c.02 OweJ 1980 ASFPM Information for local officials on flood warning systems / | VF FLOD.120.b.e.c.02 PerC 2002 ASFPM Using the National Flood Frequency Program, version 3 : a computer program for estimating magnitude and frequency of floods for ungaged sites / |
Staff. Public.
One of the major changes in flash-flood mitigation in the past decade is the number of communities that have implemented warning systems. The authors conducted a survey of 18 early-warning systems in the United States developed by communities or regions to provide protection against flash floods or dam failures. Problems revealed by the study included the following: equipment malfunctions, inadequate maintenance funding, inconsistent levels of protection and expenditure, inconsistent levels of expectations and formalization, varying levels of local commitment to the systems, underemphasis on response capability, and a tendency to over-rely on warning systems. The study also revealed some unanticipated benefits experienced by the survey communities: the warning systems serve as valuable data collection tools, a great deal of interagency cooperation has been demonstrated, and warning systems offer increased alternatives to structural modification projects. The interjurisdictional nature of drainage basins, the evolving roles of the various federal agencies involved in flood mitigation, and the lack of governmental standards of operations for flood warning systems are issues that must be considered as communities make decisions regarding the adoption of warning systems. The record on these systems is too short for a precise assessment of how successful they are; however, results of the study indicate that if the goal of reducing loss of life and property from flooding is to be achieved, warning systems must be only one part of a comprehensive flood loss reduction program.
Protected by copyright law.
There are no comments on this title.